"There can be no liberty - if the power of judging be not
separated from the legislative and executive powers." (Searle vs.
Yenson, 118 Neb. 835, 226 N.W. 464, 69 2D 953)
Now, let us take a look at the areas of jurisdictions allowed under the
Constitution to see if, we can find out what has happened to justice in
America.
Common Law - In order to have criminal penalties, there must be an
injured party [victim].
Equity Law - Deals with contracts, criminal penalties cannot be invoked
under equity jurisdiction.
Admiralty/Maritime - Admiralty is military law and maritime is the laws
of the seas. Whereas, the captain of the ship makes all laws and
contracts. Criminal penalties can be invoked without an injured party. For
example, the captain can issue an order to, "wash the deck or walk
the plank".
Now, let us take a simple traffic ticket for "failure to wear a
seat belt" and see if we can determine which of the three
jurisdictions is being used by the courts. According to the state of
California, the person has broken the law and committed a crime for which
the state imposes a $100 fine. The real question is, "Who is the
injured party?"
The answer is obvious, no one has been injured and the law says, no
injured party, no crime. The evidence speaks for itself. Therefore, the
common law cannot be the jurisdiction being used by the courts for not
wearing a seat belt.
The courts cannot use equity jurisdiction because it does not provide
for criminal penalties.
Maritime jurisdiction does provide criminal penalties without an
injured party. However, there is one major problem, maritime is the law of
the seas, not of the land.
Could it be the courts are using a "secret" jurisdiction? If
so, what would prevent passing a law under a secret jurisdiction requiring
all citizens to pay $500 a year for a license to watch T.V.? What would
prevent them from giving the police the power to enter anyone's house and
demand to see their "T.V. WATCHING LICENSE"? Furthermore, what
would prevent them from passing a law that, failure to have a T.V.
WATCHING LICENSE, would be a crime punishable by 6 months in jail and/or a
$1,000 fine for the first offense, $5,000 fine and/or 5 years in jail for
the second offense, and upon the third conviction, the person is deemed a
habitual criminal and sentenced to life imprisonment? Of course the law
just described is pretty far-fetched. Under a secret jurisdiction what
would prevent the passing and enforcement of such a law? What would
prevent the judge from giving this instruction to the jury, "If the
defendant did not have a T.V. Watching License, you must find him
guilty?" So, off he goes, directly to jail, does not pass go, to
spend the rest of his life in jail. The common law was created to prevent
usurpation of rights by giving the power to the jury to determine both the
facts and the law.
By the way, this far-fetched T.V. Watching License is required by law
in England. (Inside Edition, May 3, 1994)
By now it must be obvious to the reader that the jurisdiction being
used by the courts for not wearing a seat belt or not having a T.V.
Watching License, cannot be common law, equity law or maritime law.
Therefore, it must be a secret jurisdiction. So, let us take a look inside
the court room to see if we can find any clues to the secret. As we open
the door and step inside we see chairs for the spectators, the jury box,
the plaintiff and defendant tables, the witness stand, the judges bench
and the American and State flags. Everything has the appearance of being a
"lawful" courtroom. Until we take a closer look at the flag and
discover a gold-fringe around it. The gold-fringe is not for decoration.
The gold-fringe represents the Executive Branch, it is the flag of the
Commander-In-Chief and only flies where the President has jurisdiction. It
is a military flag. This is confirmed in 35 Am Jur 2d, Flag Sections 1
& 7, "Placing of fringe on the flag, is not a matter of detail
controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of President as
Commander-In -Chief of Army and Navy." The questions we should be
asking are, why is the Executive Branch flying its flag in the Judiciary
and, is the secret jurisdiction Admiralty/Martial Law? Unfortunately,
Martial Law is the only jurisdiction it can be. When martial law is
imposed upon the nation, the Constitution is suspended along with our
rights and liberties. Most Americans find this truth hard to swallow.
Before I submit the evidence that Martial Law Rule is in effect, I would
like to quote Frederick Douglass, 1857
"Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation,
are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain
without thunder or lightening. They want the ocean without the roar of its
waters.
This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it
may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle. Power concedes
nothing without demand.
Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the
exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and
these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or
with both.
The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom
they oppress."
Here is the real bomb shell, the "Act" of October 6, 1917,
used by Roosevelt to confiscate our gold was the "Trading With The
Enemy Act". They have declared a COVERT-WAR on us and we have been
sleeping right through it.
According to the Supreme Court decision of Stoehr vs. Wallace, 1921:
"The Trading with the Enemy Act, originally and as amended, is
strictly a war measure, and finds its sanction in the provision empowering
Congress 'to declare war, grant letters of marque and reprisal and make
all rules concerning captures on land and water' Const. Art. I, Sect. 8,
cl. 11." Since the "Act" is strictly a war measure and
America was not at war in 1933, who were the enemies of the Federal
Government of the United States under the "Trading With The Enemy
Act" as amended. Go take a look in the mirror!
Here is further proof that Martial Law Rule and a Covert-WAR has been
DECLARED and is in effect in the United States of America!
On October 6, 1917, at the beginning of America's involvement in World
War I, Congress passed the "Trading with the Enemy Act",
empowering the government to take control over any and all commercial,
monetary or business transactions. In Section 17 of the "Act" we
find the following orders: "That the district courts of the United
States are hereby given jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as
to notice and otherwise; and all such orders and decrees; and to issue
such process as may be necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the
provisions of this Act."
These powers were continued after the war via "The Trading With
the Enemy Act", as mended, and the "Agricultural Adjustment Act,
Emergency Powers" of May 12, 1933, by President Franklin D.
Roosevelt. Whereas, he said, "We will never go back to the old
order." In other words, we will not return to the Constitution. As I
shall prove.
Remember, President and TRAITOR Roosevelt used the authority of
"Trading With The Enemy Act", which according to the Supreme
Court is strictly a war measure to confiscate the Gold from the person you
saw in the mirror, the ENEMY. The "Act" prescribes for orders,
regulations, rules, and licensing of the Enemy. On December 20, 1937 the
Supreme Court became a party in the "Covert-War" with this
declaration:
"My Dear Mr. Attorney General:
By direction of the Supreme Court, I transmit to you hereinwith the
Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States
which have been adopted by the Supreme Court pursuant to the Act . . .
In accordance with Section 2 of that Act, the Court has united the
general rules prescribed by it for cases in equity with those in actions
at law so as to secure one form of civil action and procedure for both.
The Court requests you, as provided in that section, to report these rules
to the Congress at the beginning of the next session in January next.
I am requested to state that Mr. Justice Brandeis doe not approve of
the adoption of the rules. I have the honor to remain,
Respectfully yours,
(signed) Charles E. Hughes,
Chief Justice of the United States"
The powers to regulate, license, etc. under the "Trading with the
Enemy Act" is also reflected in Section 3366 of the Political Code
which provides: "Boards of supervisors of the counties of the state,
and the legislative bodies of incorporated cities and towns therein,
shall, in the exercise of their police powers, and for the purpose of
regulation, as herein provided, and not otherwise, have the power to
license all and every kind of business not prohibited by law, and
transacted and carried on within their respective jurisdictions . .
."
Perhaps, now you know why virtually every aspect of our every day life
is governed by rules, and regulations. And why it takes a permit or
license for you (the ENEMY) to do anything in America.
* Permit - "In general, any document which grants a person the
right to do something. A license or grant of authority to do a thing. A
written license or warrant, issued by a person in authority, empowering
the grantee to do some act not forbidden by law, but not allowable without
such authority.
See also Certificate, License, Special use permit."
* Permission - "A license to do a thing; an authority to do an act
which, without authority, would have been unlawful. An act of permitting,
formal consent, authorization, leaves, license or liberty granted . .
." [Editor's Note: In essence, it is not against the law, but you
can't do it until you obtain permission from the master. And if you do it
without permission, you are breaking the law. I thought the Constitution
said our right are inalienable. So why do we have to ask for permission to
exercise a right to do something that is not against the Law? Do they
think, they're our God?]
* Black's Law Dictionary 6th Edition
In Senate Report 93-549 of 1973, we will find these true but yet
startling words: "Since March the 9th, 1933, the United States has
been in a state of declared national emergency (WAR). . . For 40 years,
freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have,
in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of
national emergency . . . This vast range of powers, taken together, confer
enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal
constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these statutes,
the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of
production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute
martial law; regulate the operation of private enterprise; and, in a
plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens .
. . Enormous scope of powers . . . A time bomb."
The report goes on to read: "Furthermore, it would be a largely
futile task unless we have the President's active collaboration. Having
delegated this authority to the president - in ways that permit him to
determine how long it shall continue, simply through the device of keeping
declarations alive - we now find ourselves in a position where we cannot
reclaim the power without the President's acquiesce. We are unable to
terminate these declarations without the President's signature, so we need
a large measure of Presidential cooperation . . .
If the President can create crimes by fiat and without Congressional
approval our system is not much different from that of the Communists,
which allegedly threatens our existence."
Congressman Beck had this to say about the Emergency Powers, "But
the Constitution of the United States, as refraining influence in keeping
the federal government within the carefully prescribed channels of power,
is moribund, if not dead. We are witnessing its death-agonies, for when
this bill becomes a law, if unhappily it becomes a law, there is no longer
any workable Constitution to keep Congress within the limits of its
Constitutional powers." (Congressional Record, March 9, 1933)
Senator Church made this remarkable statement, "Like a loaded gun
laying around the house, the plethora of delegated authority and
institutions to meet almost every kind of conceivable crisis stand ready
for use for purposes other than their original intention . . . Machiavelli,
in his "Discourses of Livy," acknowledged that a great power may
have to be given to the Executive if the State is to survive but warned of
great dangers in doing so. He cautioned; Nor is it sufficient if this
power be conferred upon good men; for men of frail, and easily corrupted,
and then in a short time, he that is absolute may easily corrupt the
people . . . These powers, if exercised, would confer upon the President
total, authority to do anything he pleased." (Senate Report 93-549)
Executive Order 11677 signed by President Nixon on August 1, 1972 also
exercised the "Trading With The Enemy Act": "By virtue of
the authority vested in the President of the United States, including
Section 5 (b) of the Act October 6, 1917, as amended.."
Speaking of the powers of the President under Executive Orders, Senator
Mathias declared, "So I rather think, that under the concepts of
Nuremburg, the answer to your question is: That one who is called upon to
enforce the orders of the President would look to the Constitution and be
guided by it. Otherwise, he would suffer the penalties of Nuremburg."
(Senate Report 93-549) In other words, if anyone is called upon to enforce
the unlawful, unconstitutional Executive Orders, they would be guilty of
TREASON! And must be hung!
From the case of United States vs. Butler we find these disturbing but
nevertheless true words: "If the novel view of the General Welfare
Clause now advanced in support of the tax were accepted, this clause would
not only enable Congress to supplant the states in the regulation of
agriculture and all other industries as well, but would furnish the means
whereby all other provisions of the Constitution, sedulously framed to
define and limit the powers of the United States and preserve the powers
of the states, could be broken down, the independence of the individual
states is obliterated, and the United States converted into a central
government exercising uncontrolled police power throughout the union
superseding all local control over local concerns."
Although Public Law 94-412 of September 14, 1976 did repeal certain
emergency powers and other statutes, it did not repeal Section 5(b) of the
"Trading With The Enemy Act", as amended, 12 U.S.C. 95a; 50
U.S.C. App. 5 (b).
The Supreme Court of the United States in ex parte Milligan had to say
about martial law, "Martial law cannot arise from a threatened
invasion. The necessity must be actual and present, the invasion real,
such as effectually closes the courts and deposes the civil
administration."
Chief Justice Chase had this to say, "We by no means assert that
Congress can establish and apply the laws of war where no war has been
declared or exists. Where peace exists, the laws of peace must
prevail." Does war exist in the United States today? Yes it does, and
you are have been declared the enemy!
President Johnson's veto message of the "Reconstruction Act"
that placed the Nation under Martial Law Rule for the first time in our
nation's history is enlightening and reads, in part as follows:
"I have examined the bill 'to provide for more efficient
government of the Rebel States' with the care and anxiety which its
transcendent importance is calculated to awaken. I am unable to give my
assent for reasons so grave that I hope a statement of them may have some
influence on the minds of the patriotic and enlightened men with whom the
decision must ultimately rest.
The bill places all the people therein named under the absolute
domination of military rules; and the preamble undertakes to give the
reason upon which the measure is based and the ground upon which it is
justified. It declares that there exists in those States no legal
governments and no adequate protection for life o property, and asserts
the necessity of enforcing peace and good order within their limits. This
is not true as a matter of fact.
The excuse given for the bill in the preamble is admitted by the bill
itself not to be real. The military rule which it establishes is plainly
to be used, not for any purpose of order or the prevention of crime, but
solely as a means of coercing the people into the adoption of principles
and measures to which it is known that they are opposed, and upon which
they have an undeniable right to exercise their own judgment.
I submit to Congress whether this measure is not in its whole
character, scope, and object without precedent and without authority, in
palpable conflict with the plainest provisions of the Constitution, and
utterly destructive to those great principles of liberty and humanity for
which our ancestors on both sides of the Atlantic have shed so much blood,
and expended so much treasure.
The authority here amounts to absolute despotism. Such a power has not
been wielded by any Monarch in England for more than five hundred years.
It reduces the whole population - all persons, of every color, sex, and
condition, and every stranger to the most abject and degrading slavery. No
master ever had a control so absolute over the slaves as this bill gives .
. .
This proposition is perfectly clear, that no branch of the Federal
Government - executive, legislative, or judicial - can have any just
powers except those which it derives through and exercises under the
organic laws of the Union. Outside of the Constitution we have no legal
authority more than private citizens, and within it we have only so much
as that instrument gives us. This broad principle limits all our functions
and applies to all subjects. It protects not only the citizens of the
States which are within the Union, but shields every human being who comes
or is brought under our jurisdiction. We have no right to do in one place
more than in another that which the Constitution says we shall not do at
all . . . When an absolute sovereign reduces his rebellious subjects, he
may deal with them according to his pleasure, because he had that power
before. But when a limited monarch puts down an insurrection, he must
still govern according to law . . . This is a bill by Congress in time of
peace. There is not in any one of the States either war or insurrection.
The laws of the States and of the Federal Governments are all in
undisturbed and harmonious operation. Actual war, foreign invasion,
domestic insurrection - none of the appear; and none of these, in fact
exists. It is not even recited that any sort of war or insurrection is
threatened.
We see that martial law comes in only when actual war closes the courts
and deposes civil authority; but this bill, in time of peace, makes
martial law operate as though we were in actual war, and becomes the cause
instead of the consequence of the abrogation of civil authority . . . This
is sufficiently explicit. Peace exists in all the territory to which this
bill applies. It asserts a power in Congress, in time of peace, to set
aside laws of peace and to substitute the laws of war . . . The purpose
and object of the bill - the general intent which pervades it from
beginning to end - is to change the entire structure and character of the
States Governments and to compel them by force to the adoption of organic
laws and regulations which they are unwilling to accept if left to
themselves . . ."
Despite President Johnson's veto message, the Reconstruction Act was
passed and Martial Law fell upon the land. It remains in effect over the
Citizens of the Sovereign States today, through the continued use of
Executive Orders under the pretense of national emergencies. Further proof
that MARTIAL LAW remained in effect after the Civil War can be found in
the Congressional Globe (now called the Congressional Record). The
following are excerpts from the April 20-29, 1870 Congressional Globe
concerning H.R. 1328 which established the Department of Justice to
continue to carry out Martial Law nearly five years after the end of the
Civil War:
"The following bureaus shall be established in this department
[Department of Justice]: a bureau of international law; a bureau of
revenue law; a bureau of military and naval law; a bureau of postal law; a
bureau of land management law. . ."
Congressman Lawrence: "This bill, however, does transfer to the
law department, or the Department of Justice as it is now called, the
cognizance of all subjects of martial law, and the cognizance of all
subjects of military and naval law, except that portion of the
administration of military justice which relates to military court
martial, their proceedings, and the supervision of records. If a question
of martial law is to be determined by the law officers of Government it
will now belong to the Attorney General or to this department of justice.
It will not belong to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. He will not
be called upon for any opinion relating to martial law or military law,
except as to that portion of the administration of military law which
relates to military justice. In other words, the Judge Advocate General,
instead of giving legal opinions to the Secretary of War relating to the
status of the States of the Union, their right to call upon the Government
for military protection or military aid, and other grave constitutional
questions, will be limited. The Judge Advocate General will perform duties
administrative in their character and almost exclusively so. [Editor's
Note: This is nothing but typical double talk from the lips of a
politician. Out of one side of his mouth, the Congressman said "all
subjects of martial law and military law is transferred to the Department
of Justice." And out of the other side of his mouth he said,
"This bill does not interfere with the Judge Advocate of the Army or
his assistants so far as their official existence is concerned." The
key words are their official existence is concerned. In other words, they
officially exist but only with administrative duties. Its call
appeasement, as we shall see from the following statement.]
But I will state to the House why, in my judgment, no transfer of the
Judge Advocate General or of his duties to the Department of Justice has
been proposed in this bill. If this had been done the bill would have
encountered the opposition of some of the officers of the Bureau of
Military Justice and their friends, and so great is the power of men in
office, so difficult is it to abolish an office, that we were compelled in
the consideration of this subject to leave officers in this bureau
untouched in their official tenure in order that this bill might get
through Congress. But so far as the solicitor and naval Judge Advocate
General is concerned, he is transferred with all his supervisory power
over naval court martials, and the records and proceedings of such courts;
so that to that extent this bill accomplishes the great purpose which it
has in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the
Government. . . It is misfortunate that there should be different
constructions of the laws of the United States by different law officers
of the United States."
These traitors knew they would have encountered a opposition from the
military, so they decided to leave the military officers untouched during
their "tenure" and transfer them to supervisory positions over
court martials. This appeased the military leaders who didn't have the
foggiest idea as to what was really going on. Had the traitors fleeced the
military of all of their powers during their tenure in office they would
have realized something was happening at the hen house and would have
possibly taken military action. Unfortunately for America, our military
leaders slept right through the over-throwing of the Constitution.
The traitors were now faced with a serious problem, namely what to do
with the powers of the office of the Judge Advocate General when their
tenure in office expired. They solved this dilemma by adding the following
amendments:
"Congressman Jenckes: I move to amend section three by inserting
the word `naval' before the words Judge Advocate General."
The amendment was agreed to and later Congressman Finkelnburg stated:
"I would suggest the propriety of amending the third section of this
bill by inserting after the words `the naval solicitor and naval Judge
Advocate General' the words `who shall hereafter be know as naval
solicitor.
Mr. Jenckes: I have no objection to that amendment."
This amendment was also agreed to and the office of the Judge Advocate
General became know as the naval solicitor. Thus, when the existing tenure
was over, the new office would have a different set of rules and
regulations so that the bill accomplished the great purpose which it had
in view of bringing into one department the whole legal service of the
Government, without the power of the office of the Judge Advocate General
getting in their way. This was a necessary step to bring the President
into the position of DICTATOR over America. But they had one other problem
facing them, namely direct access to the Treasury for the Department of
Justice without interference. They accomplished this by the following
three sections of the bill:
"The eighth section provides that the Attorney General is hereby
empowered to make all necessary rules and regulations for the government.
The eleventh section provides that all moneys hereafter drawn out of
the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be disbursed
by such one of the clerks herein provided for the Attorney General as he
may designate; and so much of the first section of the act making
appropriations, passed March 3, 1859, as provides that money drawn out of
the Treasury upon requisition of the Attorney General shall be disbursed
by such disbursing officer as the Secretary of the Treasury is hereby
repealed.
The fifteenth section provides that the supervisory powers now
exercised by the Secretary of the Interior over the accounts of the
district attorneys, marshalls, clerks, and other officers of the courts of
the United States shall be exercised by the Attorney General"
Remember earlier in the chapter under the "Trading with the Enemy
Act" the district courts of the United States are hereby given
jurisdiction to make and enter all such rules as to notice and otherwise;
and all such orders and decrees; and to issue such process as may be
necessary and proper in the premises to enforce the provisions of this
Act. And now we find out that the district attorneys, marshalls, clerks,
and other officers of the courts are under the Department of Justice.
Here is another test: Under what branch of government are the following
departments?
The Department of State
(a) executive (b) legislative (c) judicial
The Department of Treasury
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Defense
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Justice
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Interior
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Agriculture
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Commerce
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Health Education and Welfare
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Housing and Urban Development
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Transportation
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Energy
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Education
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The Department of Veteran Affairs
(a) executive (b) legislative (c)judicial
The answer is found under Section 101 of Title 5 of the United States
Code: All of the above departments are under the Executive Branch. Which
raises a few more questions: Where is the separation of powers if the
Department of Justice is under the Executive Branch? Shouldn't it be part
of the Judiciary?; If only Congress has the power regulate commerce
(Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution), why are the Department of
Commerce and Department of Transportation under the Executive Branch and
not under the Legislative Branch?
* Commerce Department - "Part of the Executive branch of federal
government headed by a cabinet member (Secretary of Commerce) which is
concerned with promoting domestic and international business and
commerce."
To further illustrate the take-over by the Executive Branch of
government via Martial Law, the following are under the Department of
Justice:
Solicitor General
Office of Solicitor General
FBI
DEA
Bureau of Prisoners
Immigration and Naturalization
U.S. Marshall Service
Office of Justice Program
United States Parole Commission
United States National Central Bureau
Interpol
Office of the Pardon Attorney
Executive office of the United States Attorney
Criminal Division
Civil Division
Anti-Trust Division
Civil Rights Division
Tax Division
Environmental and Natural Resource Division
Community Relations Services
Foreign Claim Settlement Division
Executive Office of United States Trustees
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Justice Management Division
Office of Legal Counsel
Office of Policy Development
Office of Legislative Affairs
Office of Public Affairs
Office of Liaison Services
Office of Intelligence and Policy Review
Office of International Affairs
Office of the Inspector General
Office of Professional Responsibility
(American Jurisprudence 2nd Ref. Kf 154 .A42)
Ladies and gentlemen, it doesn't take a genius to realize if the
President has control over all the above departments and offices he has
control over the country. The Commmander-in-Chief has therefore become a
Dictator hiding behind the title of President. Martial Law can be in force
without placing an armed soldier on every street corner. Martial Law comes
in many shapes, sizes and jurisdictions and it can be imposed without the
public knowing it is in effect. This is accomplished by the extending of
"National Emergencies" as in the case when President Billary
Clinton signed an order on May 25, 1993 extending the national emergency
declared by President George (Traitor) Bush under Executive Order # 12808,
for another full year and Bush extended the emergency signed by Reagan,
and Reagan extended the emergency signed by Carter etc. etc. etc.
Last year alone over 67,000 pages of laws was printed in the Federal
Register. And here are some words from the book "Who Runs
Congress", "The foreign policy equivalent of executive orders
are executive agreements. Although these secret deals, signed by the
president and a foreign country, bind the nation with the force of
treaties, Congress knows nothing about them. According to Senator Clifford
Chase, some 4,000 of these agreements are now in effect."
The President of the U.S. has become the most powerful man in the world
and the most dangerous. He is a declared enemy and traitor to our country.
When the President signs an Executive Order it becomes law. Of course the
President was never granted the authority to make law as that function
belongs only to Congress. However, unconstitutional, Executive Orders have
become an accepted unlawful practice. It follows the political maxim so
common among corrupted men today, "I won't challenge your grab for
power if you won't challenge mine." In this way the State and Federal
politicians can build themselves little empires which soon become
institutionalized but with no formal grant of power from the Constitution
or Bill of Rights, therefore, their every act is unlawful, EXCEPT BY THE
GUN. Enter here the mercenaries called law enforcement to legitimize the
powers of the police state and the reign of terror begins.
* TRAITOR - "One who, being trusted, betrays; one guilty of
treason."
Thomas Jefferson said, "What has destroyed liberty and the rights
of man in every government which ever existed under the sun? The
generalization and concentrating all cares and powers under one body . . .
In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man but bind
him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution . . ."
Well its time for the sleeping GIANT to WAKE-UP. The central government
our fore-fathers warned us about is here, with all of their federal rules
and regulations over the states, business, and industry. They have their
police force within the states to see to it that their rules are followed,
i.e. OSHA, FBI, CIA, BATF, FDA, IRS, DEA, EPA, city, county and state
Police, etc.
They did not stop their TREASONOUS acts there. In the 65th Congress,
1st Session Doc. 87, under the section entitled "Constitutional
Sources of Laws of War", Clause II, we find: "The existence of
war and the restoration of peace are to be determined by the political
department of the government, and such determination is binding upon the
courts, and deprives the courts of the power of hearing proof and
determining as a question of fact either that war exists or has ceased to
exist."
By continuing to declare emergencies, the President has absolute
dictatorial powers. He and only he will determine if, and when the
Covert-War and martial law rule is over, and when his Flag will be removed
from the court rooms.
Could these Acts be the reason our rights have been turned into
privileges? Yes! It's a DE-FACTO government of tyrants operating under the
color of constitutionality. It is in total violation of the separation of
powers doctrine and over-throws the judicial and legislative branches. The
enemy has carefully selected their paid traitors (judges) to keep and
enforce the secret from the people and to protect them from We The People,
as they plunder our inalienable rights and liberties. A silent coup has
taken place in the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.
* De Facto - "In fact, in deed, actually. This phrase is used to
characterize an officer, a government, a past action, or a state of
affairs which must be accepted for all practical purposes, but is illegal
or illegitimate. Thus, an office, position or status existing under a
claim or color of right such as a de facto corporation. In this sense it
is the contrary to de jure, which means rightful, legitimate, just, or
constitutional. Thus, an officer, king, or government de facto is one who
is in actual possession of the office or supreme power, but by usurpation,
or without lawful title; . . ."
* De Facto government - "One that maintains itself by a display of
force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful,
at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful
legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof."
* Color of Law - "The appearance or semblance, without the
substance, of legal right. Misuse of power, possed by virtue of state law
and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of
state, is action taken under `color of state law.'
When used in the context of federal civil rights statues or criminal
law the term is synonymous with the concept of state action under the
Fourteenth Amendment."
* Martial Law - "Such may exist either in time of war or when
civil authority has ceased to function or has become ineffective. A system
of law, obtaining only in time of actual war and growing out of the
exigencies thereof, arbitrary in its character, and depending only on the
will of the commander of an army, which is established and administered in
a place, or, district of hostile territory held in belligerent possession,
or, sometimes, in places occupied or pervaded by insurgents or mobs, and
which suspends all existing civil laws, as well as the civil authority and
the ordinary administration of justice." [Editor's Note: The Federal
rules of civil procedures completely suspended all existing laws and the
ordinary administration of justice according to the Constitution via codes
and regulations. There is a difference between Martial Law and Martial Law
Rule. Under Martial Law rule the military is not visible as long as the
enemy co-operates. When the enemy does not co-operate the military is
called out to enforce the Law]
* Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition
George Washington, in his farewell address, gave us solemn warning,
"It
is important likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country
should inspire caution to those entrusted with its administration, to
confine themselves within their respective Constitutional spheres;
avoiding in the exercise of powers on one department to encroach upon
another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all
departments in one, and thus to create, whatever form of government, a
real DESPOTISM."
On Sept. 11, 1858, Lincoln had this to say, "Accustomed to
trample on the rights of others, you have lost the genius of your own
independence and become fit subjects of the first cunning tyrant who rises
among you."
Well, its time for the sleeping GIANT to WAKE-UP because the tyrants
and despots have arisen!
Our Declaration of Rights, in Congress, at Philadelphia, Oct. 14, 1774,
declared, "Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British
Parliament [U.S. Government], claiming a power of the right to bind the
people of America, by statute, in all cases whatsoever, hath in some acts
expressly imposed taxes on them, and in others, under various pretenses,
but in fact for the purposes of raising revenues, hath imposed rates and
duties payable in these colonies established a board of commissioners,
with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of admiralty,
not only for collecting the said duties, but for the trial of causes
merely arising within the body of a county . . .
An Act for the impartial administration of justice, in the cases of
persons questioned for any act done by them in the execution of the law .
. .
. . . And whereas, assemblies have been frequently dissolved, contrary
to the rights of the people, when they attempted to deliberate on
grievances; and their dutiful, humble, loyal, and reasonable petitions
have been repeatedly treated with contempt by His Majesty's ministers of
state:" Does all of this sound familiar to what is happening in
America today?
In his book "The Law", Bastiat wrote, "The law
Perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The
law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an
entirely contrary purpose! The law became the weapon of every kind of
greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself is guilty of the evils it
is suppose to punish! If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral
duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it."
Alexander Hamilton proclaimed, "If the representatives of
the people betray their constituents, then there is no source left but the
exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all
positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the
natural rulers of the individual State. In a single State, if the person
entrusted with supreme powers becomes usurpers, the different parcels,
subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no district
governments in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The
Citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system,
without resource; except their courage and despair. The usurpers, clothed
with the forms of legal authority can too often crush the opposition in
embryo."
Thomas Jefferson gave us these solemn words,"When it shall
be said in any country in the world: `My poor are happy; neither ignorance
nor distress is to be found among them; My jails are empty of prisoners;
My streets of beggars; The aged are not in want; The taxes not oppressive;
The rational world is my friend because I am a friend of its happiness.'
When these things can be said, then may that country boast of its
Constitution and of its Government."
The facts and evidence speak for themselves, our Constitution and the
rights and liberties secured therein have been usurped under a secret
jurisdiction of "Martial Law Rule" imposed by a Defacto
Government under a Covert-War. We have some serious decisions and actions
to take before Jefferson's words come true.
And remember our good old friend, Mr. Mulford with the Legal Department
of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco? When I told him how the
MONEY-CHANGERS had taken our gold via the "Trading With The Enemy
Act", as amended, and had declared a COVERT-WAR against the people he
laughed and replied, "It's been a long war hasn't it? . . . If we
[the Federal Reserve] were that efficient, Clinton wouldn't be worrying
about his health plan. He would simply issue it by legislative fiat."
When I asked him, "What do you call an Executive Order", he
started stuttering and avoided the question. What else could I expect from
an attorney, but to avoid the truth and slither away on his stomach.
Finally, we should take a look at the Senate Seal, it is a bundle of
sticks with an axe head on top. It also appears on the old silver dimes.
This seal is the symbol of fascism and was adopted by the Senate on
January 20, 1886. (The Flag Book if the United States)
* FASCISM - "a political philosophy, movement, or regime that
exalts nation and often race and stands for a centralized autocratic
government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social
regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."
* AUTOCRACY - "Government by one person having unlimited
power."
Ladies and gentlemen all of this is not just by coincidence, it has
been planned. ALL Americans should become instant belligerent PATRIOTS
just as our Founding Fathers did when they discovered the truth about
their Government. Turning the other cheek and remaining a cowardly
American after learning the truth, only prolongs our enslavement and the
loss of our God Given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of
happiness. If you are happy about working 6 months out of the year to pay
taxes, holding feudal title to your property, having a license or permit
to exercise your rights, you should be proud to be an American Slave
living under a DICTATORSHIP. America was founded as a free society not as
a control society under the dictatorship of the President and other
corrupt politicians.
